I do not tend to engage with him when I am happy and content in my studies or my music but rather call him when I am 'on one'. I wonder certainly if he would be welcoming of an interaction with me when I am not in that state. Perhaps he represents for me VICE.
Ultimately he is not a relevant suitor because it seems he has no ambition or drive. He sells trees for a living and parties all the time. The destructive child in me is attracted to him. I am putting that part of my personality to rest and allowing other aspects of my personality live.
There are other people I am better suited to. When the vibration matches I will not feel hesitant to speak my mind or voice my opinion because I will not feel that my intellect will make the man feel insecure, which is why I have deduced I am at times non-vocal. Granted, each person has his/her own fortes and areas of expertise and we can all learn from one another in our understanding.
Why can't men I meet be Knox Ziegler without being Knox Ziegler? Or Mark Siegel? Perhaps the very nature of our platonic relationship is the reason for our easeful conversation.
It seems the key will be to treat the men I am in bed with as if they are platonic friends and not put them on a pedestal.
No comments:
Post a Comment